Isn’t essential for the field of zoology to acquire
and accumulate the knowledge of accurate description for animals? Isn’t
essential for the field of botany to acquire and accumulate the knowledge of
accurate description for plants? The same is true for various sub-fields of
microbiology such as virology, mycology, parasitology, and bacteriology.
Likewise, accumulating knowledge of accurate description of atoms, molecules,
compounds or elements is an essential for each sub-field of chemistry such as
organic, inorganic or bio chemistry.
Mankind’s scientific knowledge in each of the
scientific disciplines is kind of like a large picture drawn on a huge canvas,
where the picture comprising numerous small parts/pieces representing our
perception of reality. Each small part of the picture represents a piece of
knowledge/fact, where most parts/pieces are clearly visible, while few are
blurred (out of focus) & others are hardly visible. The goals of each
scientific discipline is to acquire and accumulate pieces/parts of knowledge of
facts for painting increasingly clearer picture (i.e. evolving our perception
of realty closer and closer to absolute truth/true-reality), for example, by finding
more accurate facts of description or nature of various specimens and species,
which includes clearly documenting flawless knowledge for recognizing finer
differences in each part/piece like best discriminating connoisseurs.
It is foolish to define the nature of planets without
any basis in reality and expect nature to change its course to fit the baseless
definitions. Likewise, acquire and accumulate the knowledge of accurate
description for component/CBD is essential for researchers of components/CBD. It
is foolish to define the nature of component without any basis in reality and
expect nature to change its course to fit the baseless definitions. It is huge
error to assume and use the term components as a synonym to parts either having
certain useful properties (e.g. reusable or standardized) or conforming to, so
called component models (where each component model is defined without any basis
in reality).
I believe biology, zoology or scientific discipline
of microbiology such as virology, mycology, parasitology, and bacteriology are at
least 25 to even up to 100 times complex than Componentalogy - a new scientific
discipline proposed in computer science. The purpose of Componentalogy is acquiring
& accumulating flawless pieces of knowledge of scientific facts by painting/re-painting
each piece/part of the image for increasing the clarity and evolving increasingly
clearer picture dawn on a huge canvas (i.e. evolving our perception of realty
closer and closer to true-reality). Mankind must find accurate description and
nature of various kinds of parts and various kinds components (i.e. sub
disciplines), which includes clearly documenting each part/piece of knowledge for
easily recognizing finer differences in each of the parts like best discriminating
connoisseurs.
The very purpose of scientific research is to evolve
humankinds understanding (or perception) of reality closer and closer to
absolute truth. It is like painting a clearer and clearer picture by using
brighter colors (e.g. by research papers and results of experiments) to bring into
focus blurred/invisible details of each small part/piece of very large picture
drawn on a huge canvas.
If science is progressing in right/wrong direction,
drawing clearer picture one small piece at a time to bring each piece into
focus is what scientists do. Mankind’s experience/history proves that a flaw in
seed axiom side tracks the scientific progress into a paradoxical paradigm and
the field sooner or later end up in crisis, which containing many inexplicable contradictions
and anomalies. In this case, if there are errors in seed axioms, the picture of
mankind’s perception of reality end up moving further and further away from
absolute truth/reality.
Mankind must erase old picture (i.e. perceived
reality) evolved for decades by relying on flawed seed axiom and must start redrawing
a new picture of reality by relying on flawless axioms. It is a complex/contentious
endeavor to evolve a new reality (in right direction by relying on error free
seed axioms) for replacing old perception of reality (evolved for decades in
wrong direction) – a true Gestalt shift. Also referred to as Kuhnian paradigm
shift. The 2 pictures in FIG-1 & FIG-4 respectively presents mankind’s 2
perceptions of realities, before and after exposing the error in seed axiom of
Geocentric-paradigm prevailed until 500 years ago: http://real-software-components.com/more_docs/epicyles_facts.html.
