Dear Friends,
Software engineering has been
collectively conditioned between 1960s and 1980s by harsh and painful
experiences of failures (e.g. infamous software crisis) and entrapped by “The
Elephant Rope Syndrome” for past 25 years. The researchers of computer science
and software assumed 50 years ago that it is impossible to invent
real-software-components (that are equivalent to the physical components) for
achieving real-CBD (Component Based Design) for software, which is equally
powerful (and useful) as the CBD for physical products (i.e. equivalent for
enjoying the true essence of the CBD).
As a baby elephant is
incapable of breaking rope, it is understandable, why it was inconceivable of
inventing real-software-components (essential for achieving real CBSD) by the
primitive technologies existed 50 years ago and the state of computer science
knowledge existed then. As the baby elephant can grow to be a mighty elephant
in few decades, software technologies advanced substantially, but now mighty
software is enslaved by prejudice & pre-conceived notions, which were
conditioned by decades old experiences of painful failures.
The mighty elephant’s
perceived limitation and weakness enslaved by the false consciousness of limitations
existed in the past (but no longer true). Hence, software engineering has been
suffering the Baby Elephant Syndrome by not even making any attempt to break
free from the enslavement of things such as the infamous software crisis. For
example, the software researchers have been refusing to gain necessary
theoretical knowledge by using proven scientific methods for discovering
objective reality such as (i) obvious facts about the nature and true essence
of the CBD and (ii) nature and essential properties uniquely and universally
shared by each and every known physical component.
If the essential properties
of the components are {R & S}, no physical part can ever be a component
without havening the properties {R & S}. Likewise, no software part can be
a real-software-component without having the properties {R & S}. Once such
essential properties are discovered, it is a trivial task to invent
software-components having the essential properties.
It is impossible to achieve
real-CBD by using fake components (i.e. any other kind of parts not having the
essential properties). Software researchers are stubbornly refusing to gain
necessary knowledge about the nature and objective reality about the components
and CBD, by insisting that it is impossible to invent real-software-components
and CBD by citing past painful experiences of failures (e.g. decades old things
such as “Mythical Man Month” and “No Silver Bullet”).
Software researchers have
been brain washed to accept the limitations (existed decades ago and by the
past experiences), which are no longer exist since 1990. Based on painful
experiences of failures few decades ago (as a baby elephant), software
researchers have been foolishly arguing that, even decades of relentless
scientific and technological advancements (even after grownup to be a mighty
elephant) could never overcome imaginary hurdles such as acquiring necessary
knowledge for inventing real-software-components and necessary enabling
mechanisms or processes for achieving the real-CBSD.
Today researchers react as if
it is a heresy to question the 50 year old unproven or untested myths. Many
foolish researchers insisted that, even million years of technological
advancements can’t break the rope, as if those unproven myths are proven inalienable
laws of nature. In effect, they imply that I am a liar, crazy or even fraud in
open forum, when I make the following claims (that are backed by 6 US
Pioneer-soft discovered
necessary knowledge for inventing real-software-components and necessary
enabling mechanisms or processes for achieving the real-CBSD. Unfortunately,
software researchers refusing to even look at the evidence (e.g.
real-software-components and software designed and build by employing CBD),
which exposes “the Elephant rope syndrome”. I may have to bribe the software
researchers to do their duty, since the researchers abdicated their moral and
ethical obligation to address counter-evidence, which helps them overcome “the
Elephant rope syndrome” by exposing flawed concepts, theories or observations
(of epicycles) being promoted today.
Isn’t it classic example for “the
Baby Elephant Syndrome”: If it was inconceivable for the best technologies available
(e.g. assembly or Fortran languages) in 1960s (as a baby), it is foolish to insist
that it will be inconceivable even in the future (for hundreds of years), even
after substantial scientific and technological advancements (grownup to be a
mighty elephant).
Unfortunately, researchers foolishly
react as if I am a liar or crazy for trying to expose “the Baby Elephant Syndrome”
of software researchers or engineering, which already cost trillions of dollars
to the world economy and would cost trillions more. Technologies for software
engineering advanced sufficiently, by 1990, to break free from “the enslavement”,
but researchers have been foolishly refusing to even try to free from the
enslavement. Instead they imply that I am a liar or crazy for trying to expose
their flawed prejudice and myths.
P.S:
Proof backed by evidence and facts can be found at my ResearchGate account: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Raju_Chiluvuri4,
at my web-site http://real-software-components.com/moredocs.html
and empirical evidence can be provided by using Pioneer-soft’s GUI-technologies
at: http://Pioneer-soft.com
Best Regards,
Raju S Chiluvuri
