tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4940288561154033329.post2754357775901824975..comments2017-01-25T04:32:14.419-08:00Comments on The sacred duty of scientific research and researchers is pursuit of absolute truth.: The process of scientific research is broken in the computer science and it must be fixed by following simple scientific principles of basic sciencesAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09834194277539725731noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4940288561154033329.post-29184078088675833902013-11-28T01:11:01.065-08:002013-11-28T01:11:01.065-08:00The philosophers 400 year ago refuse to believe th...The philosophers 400 year ago refuse to believe the fact that the Earth is moving, since geocentric-paradigm had been evolving for centuries due to the effort of them and many generations before them, who lived all their lives on the Earth, found no reason to doubt root postulation that the Earth is static. Their hard work and brute force to understand the nature over the centuries without realizing the error resulted in deeply entrenched collective wisdom and a complex paradigm comprising accumulation of a huge collection of observations and concepts, which they could use to justify the geocentric-model. For example, the gravity was not discovered and they can show any one epicycles and retrograde motion of the planets (while the Sun and Moon were in circular orbits).<br /><br />Likewise, many software experts refusing to accept simple facts, just because many generations of software researchers have been evolving a complex software engineering paradigm by relying on the unsubstantiated postulations (which are in clear contradiction to known facts about CBD of physical products and reality of physical functional components). Most software experts readily admit that the definitions are clear contradiction to the facts and reality (i.e. with respect to physical components and CBD of physical products). The brute force of researchers to advance the software engineering since 1970 without validating the postulations resulted in a complex paradigm and deeply entrenched collective wisdom.<br /><br />The experts use baseless excuses that software is different or unique to justify the contradictions, and refuse to provide any valid reason to explain why and what manner design of software products different. It is impossible to find any valid reason why it is not possible to invent real-software-components equivalent to the physical functional-components (by having the unique essential properties universally shared by the physical functional-components) for achieving the real-CBSD (e.g. CBD-structure for securing benefits being enjoyed by the designers of physical CBD-products) in light of the 3-CBD-facts at: http://real-software-components.com/technologies/CBD-facts-rules.html<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09834194277539725731noreply@blogger.com