tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4940288561154033329.post6816646238293231910..comments2017-01-25T04:32:14.419-08:00Comments on The sacred duty of scientific research and researchers is pursuit of absolute truth.: I disparately need help: How can I put research in the right path, which ended up in a wrong path due to mistakes committed 50 years ago?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09834194277539725731noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4940288561154033329.post-78184472033992791612016-11-13T02:39:28.920-08:002016-11-13T02:39:28.920-08:00Dear Friends,
Let me paraphrase noted philosophe...Dear Friends,<br /><br /><br />Let me paraphrase noted philosopher Bertrand Russell’s famous quote: “The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves (i.e. about their myth ‘the Earth is static’), and wiser people so full of doubts (i.e. about the truth ‘the Sun is at the center’).” Likewise, today the wiser people are so full of doubts about the objective reality such as irrefutable facts about the nature and essence of the CBD. But the fools and fanatics are so certain that the CBD is using fake software components, where each kind of so called software components are by definition a kind of software parts either having a given useful properties (e.g. reusable or standardized) or conforming to so called component models.<br /><br />Existing definitions for so called software components have no basis in reality (in fact are clear contradiction to the known objective reality), but rooted in 50 years old myths based on wishful thinking, such as utopian fantasy of building software by assembling reusable and/or standardized COTS (Commercially off the Shelf) components (analogues to how computer makers design and build computers by assembling COTS component from 3rd party component vendors).<br /><br />The geocentric model evolved for centuries by accumulating many pieces of knowledge for expanding the BoK (Body of Knowledge), which was filled with thousands of concepts and observations of retrograde motions and epicycles). This kind of flawed BoK also shaped the mankind’s flawed perception of reality (that we now know was in clear contradiction to the objective reality). Likewise, exiting BoK for software engineering and CBSD have been accumulating countless pieces of knowledge for expanding the BoK (e.g. comprising tens of thousands of published research papers and thousands of books printed world over since 1970s about so called software components), which also shaped the existing flawed perception of reality about the CBD (that is in clear contradiction to the objective reality and known facts about the real CBD).<br /><br />It is a fool’s errand to invest research efforts on the geocentric paradox of software engineering. I am only requesting wiser people to investigate the objective reality and irrefutable facts for discovering the right path. Kindly never forget that your existing perception of so called CBD/components have been shaped by flawed BOK rooted in 50 years old flawed myths. If wise experts don’t stand up for the Truth, it is impossible to put research efforts on the right path. Our beloved computer science could never invent solutions for many outstanding problems such as infamous software crisis or real machine intelligence (or real Artificial Intelligence). The solutions for many such problems will be in plain sight once the research efforts are directed in to the right path. <br /><br />Best Regards,<br />Raju S Chiluvuri<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09834194277539725731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4940288561154033329.post-83538246220286098312016-11-12T09:52:12.878-08:002016-11-12T09:52:12.878-08:00Dear Mr. Vermijs,
Thank you. Very few software e...Dear Mr. Vermijs,<br /><br /> Thank you. Very few software experts have courage and confidence to openly say what you said. Our field computer science has been on the wrong path for past 50 years. Almost no one publicly supported “the heliocentric reality” 400 years ago.<br /><br />I can’t believe, even in the 21st century software experts are scared to publicly support the objective reality of the CBD: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284167768_What_is_true_essence_of_Component_Based_Design and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292378253_Brief_Introduction_to_COP_Component_Oriented_Programming <br /><br />Isn’t it common sense that any research efforts ends up in wrong path, if it relies on fundamentally flawed myths such as “the Earth is static” and the nature and essence of CBD for software is using reusable and/or standardized software components (without any basis in reality or facts, but in fact in clear contradiction to the reality: http://real-software-components.com/CBD/main-differences.html )?<br /><br />Best Regards,<br />Raju S Chiluvuri<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09834194277539725731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4940288561154033329.post-5400573036047702962016-11-12T09:28:58.329-08:002016-11-12T09:28:58.329-08:00Dear Raju your analysis about software junk is cor...Dear Raju your analysis about software junk is correct. I will study your publications with growing interest and will try to get into your world for even better understanding and to connect your thougths with mine.<br /><br />Greetings<br /><br />Ad Vermijs<br />avermijs@xs4all.nl<br />www.adels-it.nl (English version is being prepared) Ad Vermijshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05897433764240434687noreply@blogger.com